Number of games

The more games available to choose from, the more confidence of winning a player has. More games means a wide variety to choose from and thus a player can choose the game he is sure of winning. A top casino would consider this thus making it easy to attract more gamblers and have an improved reputation. Online casino with a number of games to choose from will definitely be top class.

Customer review

If it has been tried, tested and rated as good by a group of people with common and related interests, then chances are high that it is the best bet you can find. If you looking for the best, be sure to look for what others have used and they have attested that it is worth. The best will be the one with more positive feedback reviews and you can have peace trusting it.

There is a competition out there and you definitely will be spoilt for choices in the course of your selection. Do get confused and then be swayed in your judgment. The choice you make will determine how you play and to get the top, you must think smart. Consider these points and you will definitely choose the top online casino you can ever find.

Betting is indeed a hard thing to do. This feeling can be aggravated by that news of gamblers being harassed because of debts as a consequence of a bad bet they have made. The advent of online casinos in Canada does not make betting easier. It actually makes it harder. Playing online casino does not allow you to see your opponent face to face and can’t even get a hint from the physical feels very usual in a live gambling. Here are some betting tips that may be helpful.

In every gambling game, to make an intelligent bet, you must know the rules thoroughly. You should be adept on the terms of betting your own money. Online casinos have varying rules when it comes to betting and being ignorant of these can lead to unimaginable losses. This is worst when you don’t have any extra cash with you. When during your gambling, you are already at a loss and incurring debt, eliminate the mentality that playing more can make you recover. This debt chasing attitude usually leads you to be buried some more. Many people are too hardheaded not following this rule making them suffer the worst consequences. Be not one of them. When you are on the winning side, take advantage of the situation. This is the best opportunity to make huge bets. But, learn when to stop. Do not expect that the lucky streak will always be on your side, because should it decide to shift, it might leave you incurring losses.

Once you are already prepared for your strategic betting, you can be confident to join online casino tournaments. These tournaments are specifically designed to lure players to play some more with the opportunity to win so much higher than the regular rounds. This also allow player to showcase their competencies and reveal who is the unbeatable after face off with other players. The number of casino tournament in an online casino is as large as the number of games. You just have to identify that game that you would like to participate into such as slots and poker tournaments among others. You also have to determine the schedule of the tournament that you would like to accommodate.

The next thing to do is to fill up the registration form online and wait for your confirmation. Remember that when you register, you will also be required to deposit a certain amount. The preferred method online is either credit card or Paypal. But there are the so called freeroll tournament that does not require registration fees to be paid. Beware also that online casino do not usually accommodate late registrants. As with the traditional casino, playing tournament online also require to come on time. The game will start even without you coming. Coming late also means losing your shots.

One of these online poker sites is Cake Poker that does not only have big bonuses; it also is well regulated and owns a valid gaming license. The bonus offered is truly amazing. It’s a 110% up to $600 first deposit bonus awarded if a player enters a Poker770 coupon code upon registration.

Another blog poker site with a huge bonus deal is Party Poker that also awards the player with a huge bonus of 100% up to $500. Also, new registrants will have to use Party Poker bonus codes 2012 when registering in order to receive the bonus.
Claiming a huge bonus is important, because then the player will be allowed to play much more games than the usual. For example, in the two previous sites, if the player deposits $1,000, he will receive another $2,000 completely for free.

Playing at these three sites or one of these three sites is very lucrative. No other sites have such big bonuses in the business. You can find these poker bonus deals at Party Poker bonus codes. There are also other sites on the web, but it’s essential one looks carefully if the respective sites have a valid gaming license. If they don’t then usually the respective site is a scam.

There actually was a pot limit stud game poker online not too long ago. $2 ante with a $2 bring in, always a long list for it on weekends. The game was mostly populated with relatively weak players, many bordering on the extreme gambling side, and all were relatively short stacked for the nature of the game. The game no longer is in existance as the casino which used to host it decided to do away with poker. I do believe, however, that there are several pot limits and no limit stud games spread regularly throughout Europe, and I do occasionally hear of a pot limit stud or stud hi/lo home game. Of course the reason that these games are relatively rarer than their flop game counterparts is because of the relative increased variance in stud games.

As sort of a side note, I went to a local casino to play in a stud tournament about a month ago, and they were having satellites beforehand. By the time I managed to get into one, it was about a half hour before the tournament was supposed to start, so we all agreed to play  instant win scratch card games and it was so much fun. (After about three five minute rounds, the antes went up every hand–that was interesting.) It was actually a pretty interesting game. The wild players busted out pretty much right away, and the rest of the players were too cautious to really play no limit, and also busted out (it helped that I got rolled up jacks when we got heads up, and my opponent went all in before me. From my (very) limited experience, I don’t think it’s a very viable game, for the reason that SteadyEd mentioned–it’s almost impossible to draw–if anyone at the table knows what they’re doing, you won’t be getting the right price for your draw.

Same skill I would buy in for $1,000. Plenty of Canadian online casino establishment has increase number of local Canadian employment, by employing call centre, online marketing and other staff. If I’m slightly better $1,000 or $50,000 would be O.K. If I’m a lot better $50,000 seems reasonable, since you can net $574,000.

I guess it’s 1,000 in all cases. The fewer chips you have the more valuable each chip is, so paying $1,000 for 1000 chips is a bargain.

From a pure mathematical standpoint, the fewer chips you have the more valuable each chip is in a percentage payout tournament. Does this imply you should buy only 1 chip? No, because the second chip, and each succeeding chip until you have an average stack (assuming tournament just starting) will also be positive expectation. You should buy $10,000 worth. This brings up an interesting point. How significant is this effect (different chip values for different stack sizes) this early in the tournament? I believe that nearly all tournament theorists grossly overestimate the importance of this effect. For the tournament as described, this effect will be completely insignificant (i.e. less than 1% difference for the value of a chip in a short stack versus an average stack) until the final table is set. For a 300 player tournament paying 3 tables, different chip values for different stacks does not begin to be a factor (for small and average stacks) until there are perhaps 6 tables left. Much more significant is the skill factor. If you have even an infinitesimal skill edge, you have a higher positive expectation the more chips you buy. If you are slightly worse than average, do not enter the tournament at all, or buy $1000. Another point: if you are in a tournament and are worse than average with an average stack, you should be thrilled to get your money in with a small pair against AK or the other way around. You can also exert a lot of pressure on superior players with similar stacks sizes who do not want to commit there stacks on a 50-50 proposition. (Do not gamble excessively with a large stack in a no-limit tournament, as your skill deficit will be more of impairment the more chips you have.)

Question: 48

Why is it that there are no-limit and pot-limit hold-em and Omaha games, but there aren’t any no-limit or pot-limit stud games?

Answer 1:

I have read several of your books and value your opinion. That is what Paradise Poker said too. Guess that I am not ready to play online holdem. If you have time to reply again. I put the AKo raiser on making the flush on the turn and waiting until the river to raise. Would you have called in my place?

Answer 2:

I think if you put REAL money in a cyber game where you can’t see or hear your opponents, you may as well play a 6/5 video poker game….its probably smarter.

Answer 3:

This is almost certainly not collusion. If it is, it’s poorly devised. Players are not always afraid of flushes, especially knowledgeable players. And while a raise with A-K (top pair and an ace) may seem reckless, it doesn’t appear to help the partnership if there were one. And it is likely to do harm. The A-K came all that way hoping to draw out by making a big pair. He caught perfect. I think honest players need to base their suspicions less on the fact that opponents played poorly (or even irrationally) when they suffer a bad beat and more on whether the specific actions would seem to help those opponents if they were colluding. On the other hand, you’re right to pose the question, and you need to always be on alert for collusion wherever you play poker. Better safe than sorry.

Answer 1:

It takes three things to win a poker tournament #1 enough money to get in #2 enough courage to go broke on every hand #3 enough luck to draw out when they have the best hand… Skill has very little to do with it at the final table. But skill has a lot to do with it on the way there in the early rounds skill is 90% Luck 10% At the final table it is the other way around Skill is 10% and luck and courage are 90%. I have played in all of the little tournaments and all of the big ones and the skill is better in the little ones, Courage is the best in the big ones.

Answer 2:

As someone who has had quite a fair amount of success in tournaments, I’ll contribute my own 2 cents. It’s hard to actually give actual percentages of skill vs. luck. With no skill, you’d have to have a LOT of luck to do well. In fact, almost no amount of luck can offset a lack of skill. On the flip side, bad luck can offset a fair amount of skill. In order to do well, you need to get lucky at LEAST 4 or 5 times in a tourney. And you have to get lucky at the right times. But what a lot of people don’t realize is that you also have to put yourself in position to get lucky, or to minimize the affects of getting unlucky. There are still times where there’s nothing you can do (like getting A’s and K’s snapped off by 2′s hitting trips on 7th street at the final table of a stud tourney), when there’s just nothing you can do. But I got more thanmy share of GOOD beats during the tourney that I didn’t even react at all and just calmly walked to the rail. Also, the kinds of skills necessary to do well in a tourney vary. I do not consider myself a stellar player at stud, holdem, or Omaha, and yet I have placed in tournaments in all of those games. What I *do* consider myself good at is tournament strategy. This skill is even more important in smaller tournaments or ones with rapidly escalating blinds. Further, I think POKER skill and player reading skill is more important in no limit tournaments than in limit tournaments. And in an event that takes place over 4 days, luck and tournament strategy are almost certainly dominated by these two skills. There are lots of people who are excellent ring game players but can’t do well in tournaments because they can’t adjust to the tournament strategies. I’ve seen some monumental and fundamental tournament blunders, even at final tables in tournaments. My guess is that the single most important factor in doing well in tournaments
is tournament strategy. Card skill is probably next, and then luck, followed by people reading.

Answer 3:

Got to thinking about this “once again” I just came off a wave of cold cards and couldn’t score in a tournament for about a month. I have a decent consistent record over the last 2 years and 150+ tournaments but I got to thinking how much luck is involved. I always thought if I got an even break in the cards I’d win my share. I also think if I play good and get in a position to score enough of the time the cards will come often enough to make it a winning situation for me. I am guessing the luck ratio is about 40% – and skill and game strategy about 60%. I know others who think it is more like 90% luck and others who think it is 90% skill. I’m interested to know what the opinions are here. They are both right. It depends on the tournament. The structure of the tournament determines how large factor luck is. Many card rooms offer low cost or free roll tournaments designed to attract players at slow times. Many of them are structured to last only an hour. Those are 90% luck. A tournament must last at least 4 or 5 hours before skill becomes a significant factor, but you’ll always need luck. Because of the luck factor, a good player doesn’t count on always winning. But a good player should be in the money fairly consistently in a tournament of suitable duration.

Answer 1:

One thing that can’t be overemphasized is the importance of position in this game. Even with a premium hand, you don’t necessarily want to raise UTG in pot-limit Omaha. The problem is that when you don’t flop a set, you’re now leading into a crowd with a mediocre hand that’s easily beaten. An exception is when you can get all-in pre-flop, but here the money was too deep for that. Aces are much weaker in Omaha than in holdem, and the gain from building the pot pre-flop is small. On the flop, you’re committed. You have to call here, so you might as well bet yourself.

Answer 2:

A free card would be a mistake here, since your opponents could easily make two pair or a straight to beat you. 953 rainbows are about the safest flop your over pair could have. Assuming you called the buttons raise, there would be more players and less money in the pot. This is bad for aces. I’m not disagreeing out of habit; I think the player in question made the right move by re-raising with aces. What the other guy was doing calling a re-raised pot with nines I have no idea. Also, as there is less money in the pot, the bet would have been smaller to you. I would check, then call or raise depending on the action behind me. You would really fold aces to what you yourself said were the safest possible flop (no made straights or flushes possible)? I would not put a guy who called a re-raise on 9s, 5s, or 3s, would you? If everyone will call one raise, then I might pop it UTG, but I wouldn’t re–raise the button’s re-raise. Why not? You have AA double suited. Look forward to your dissenting response.

Answer 3:

I would have played the hand EXACTLY the same way that you did. Just calling the raise before the flop and letting everyone else in would really have been asking for trouble. Iceman’s approach is too passive for pot limit in general because it doesn’t punish those who limp in cheaply getting very high implied odds. However, he’s right about your bet on the flop.

 Answer 1:

If your tournaments are about the same in terms of entry fees and prize money, the test is fairly routine. But it is not much fun to describe the procedure in a news message. You would need statistical tables of the Normal and/or T-distributions. And if you have these tables, you probably have the stat book. Calculate the mean, calculate the standard deviation. Decide how certain you want your results to be. Standard certainty is 95% certain. Mean = average winnings per tourney. Std deviation is the square root of [(w1 - Mean)^2 + (w2-M)^2 + . . . .(wn-M)^2]/(n-1)

Answer 2:

Most of the tournaments are essentially identical but the results don’t form a Normal distribution. Well, I suppose my relative finishing positions produce something pretty close to a Normal distribution but the monetary values don’t. Plotting frequency against result produces a sharp peak centered around (minus) one buy-in with a tail extending out to (minus) 13 buy-ins (don’t ask) and an extended, essentially flat line of wins up to 255 buy-ins (I’ll talk about that one all day). Calculating the SD on the figures produces a figure for -1SD that’s almost as large as my two biggest buy-ins of all time combined! Unless there’s some way of fitting (?fiddling) the results into a Normal curve I’m assuming a non-parametric test is needed but my knowledge of statistics is sparse and the baby books I’ve consulted don’t seem to offer the solution I’m after.

Answer 3:

I’m pretty sure you can still use the normal curve for this kind of analysis: the results themselves don’t have to fall into a normal curve, but instead it’s the distribution of sample means. In any event, I’m also almost certain that you don’t have a big enough sample to get to anything meaningful in this analysis. As you said the pop std deviation is extremely high, and to counteract that you’d have to have a huge number of data points. Let me give you an example of what I mean. Let’s say that the difference between first place in a tournament and third place is 3 times as much money, and that the difference between finishing first and finishing third in a tournament comes down to some even-moneyish matchup such as AK vs QQ. Even if this happens ONCE, think about the skew it puts on the population mean. Instead of 25 buying profit, you might have 75 buying profit. Over 500 tournaments, that’s still a lift of .1 buying per tournament to your mean for the entire population, just from that oen event. I think that the most likely result of most tournament analysis is going to be a general indication of approximate overlay. Applying traditional statistical tests with any smallish alpha is going to be fruitless because the variance is so high.

Answer 1:

You will get much valuable experience online by playing at the play-money tables offered by paradisepoker.com. Go to paradisepoker.com, download the programming files, and play for imaginary bucks with a good overall poker text at your side. (Pick up a copy of “Poker for Dummies” (just out) at any Borders or Barnes and Noble.)

Answer 2:

If you are out in LV, many of the casinos have a time in the mornings when they offer classes. These classes are really nothing more than the basic rules of the game and the etiquette of casino poker (playing in turn, how to bet/raise, etc.). However, if you have NEVER played before, it can be a quite valuable free lesson. I have taken the craps “course” before that gave me a good understanding of some of betting aspects of the game I was unclear on (like COME bets – when is the odds an even number, etc.).

Answer 3:

I’d advice against the morning “Kitchen Table Poker” lessons at the Excalibur. I’m not quite sure what I thought I was expecting, but I got the feeling that I was playing with anything but beginners. They basically sat us down at the table and went over the rules very briefly and then, suddenly; I was losing hands to guys with a pair deuces and thirty dollars in the pot! They had some kind of a “Free Gift!” for attending, but whatever it was they were conveniently out of it that day. No one apologized, nobody took my name and promised to mail me one, and nobody moved the sign even. Between that, a huge mix-up in the requirements for the Poker Rate on a room and the closing of Lance-A-Lotta-Pasta (it’s now a WCW wrestling-themed restaurant, if you can imagine–knights, dragons and wrestlers?) we probably won’t be going back to the Ex any time soon–and we were married there when it had only been open for a month. We had so much fun back then that we came back a year later on our anniversary. My recommendation would be to buy the Lee Jones book and just about any other, and then get Wilson’s Turbo Texas Hold’Em and not go near a real casino until you’d played about 2500 hands. It’s much easier to lose play money than the real thing.